Posts Tagged ‘twitter’

How to use Twitter if you are connected to an MP in any way

Thursday, January 26th, 2012

by Holly Smith

As you may well know we’ve just published How To Be An MP, a witty look at how to survive life in the House of Commons, by veteran MP Paul Flynn.

Are you starting to think someone should write a sequel, called ‘How to Work for an MP’? Because although you might have thought that it goes without saying, the correct way to work for an MP probably doesn’t involve the whole of Twitter joining forces to save your job, as happened this afternoon when Tom Watson’s intern decided to “twit-rape” Mr Watson (their words, not mine).

Tom Watson’s intern isn’t the only one. Who remembers Diane Abbott’s “over enthusiastic staffer” retweeting a YouGov poll during the two minutes silence on Armistice Day? The “junior” member of staff responsible for Ed Miliband’s brilliant “Blackbusters” tweet? Whilst the horror of these errors might have been a good character-building experience, it’s probably for the best that someone shows these novices how it’s done.

We could make it a series. “How to use Twitter if you’re an MP”. “Why it isn’t a good idea to let anyone who isn’t you get hold of your social media login details, especially if you’re an MP”. “How to use Twitter if you are connected to an MP in any way”. “How to use Twitter if you’re young and once handed out a leaflet for a political party and the organisers thought ‘there’s a young person, quickly get a picture of them with a rosette so we’ll seem young too’ and therefore a Twitpic of you raising your glass at a party will result in a national headline, accompanied by the rosette picture, along the lines of ‘young Conservative/Labourite/Liberal Democrat put their hand a bit in the air and is probably a Nazi and why are young people drinking anyway?’”.

Until that day comes do the right thing and buy Paul Flynn’s How To Be an MP.

More celebrity gagging orders revealed…

Thursday, May 12th, 2011

So, the growing disquiet surrounding injunctions and super injunctions is a tricky issue, to say the least. There to prevent publication of details about the private lives of well-known people, it is easy to see the motivations for those wishing to take out these so- called “gagging orders”. A desire to keep their private lives private is understandable; however, the issue comes when considering whether the freedom of speech act is being jeopardised.

As a result of the difficulty in this balancing act, the matter seems to be spiraling out of control. Some are determined to get round the media gagging and are now using websites such as Twitter to expose alleged celebrity indiscretions. Just last night a well-known blogger used a Twitter account to list 14 personalities and to make obscure references to them. This follows on from the tweets this week of a list of celebrities who have recently obtained injunctions, coming without any apparent sanction.

More than two million people are thought to have been forwarded last week’s list exposing certain celebrities. However, it appears that these exposés are not entirely accurate. Jemima Khan and Gabby Logan have both adamantly denied the allegations against them regarding alleged infidelities with other well-known people, exposing the danger that comes in such revelations. It’s all very well citing freedom of speech and a right to know but when individuals are targeted without real evidence, there is the potential to seriously damage the reputations and lives of those targeted.

Culture Secretary Jeremy Hunt said yesterday that Twitter was “making a mockery” of privacy laws and has pledged to examine how best to bring regulations up to date. Prime Minister David Cameron has also sounded a warning about the way judges rather than Parliament are creating a new law of privacy by granting such injunctions.

Whatever your view on the matter, the situation surrounding injunctions and super injunctions is clearly extremely messy and needs to be resolved. Quickly!